When it concerns criminal sanctions, what people think to be suitable is largely figured out by the concept of punishment to which castle subscribe. That is, world tend to agree through the theory of punishment that is most likely to generate the outcome they think is the correct one. This device of beliefs about the purposes of punishment often spills over right into the political arena. Politics and correctional plan are intricately related. Plenty of of the changes seen in corrections plan in the joined States throughout this time to be a enjoy of the political climate that the day. Throughout the an ext liberal times of the 1960s and 1970s, criminal sentence were greatly the domain of the judicial and also executive branches of government. The role of the legislatures throughout this duration was to architecture sentencing regulations with rehabilitation as the major goal. Throughout the politically conservative era the the 1980s and also 1990s, legislator took much of that power away indigenous the judicial and executive branches. Lot of the politics rhetoric of this time was around “getting difficult on crime.” The correctional purposes of retribution, incapacitation, and deterrence came to be dominate, and also rehabilitation was shifted come a remote position.

You are watching: Which of the following sentencing goals is closely associated with the phrase "an eye for an eye"?


It has been a renowned notion transparent the ages that fear of punishment deserve to reduce or remove undesirable behavior. This id has constantly been popular among criminal righteousness thinkers. These principles have to be formalized in several different ways. The Utilitarian thinker Jeremy Bentham is attributed with articulating the three facets that should be current if deterrence is come work: The punishment need to be administered through celerity, certainty, and also appropriate severity. These elements are used under a type rational selection theory. Rational selection theory is the basic idea that human being think about committing a crime before they carry out it. If the rewards of the crime outweigh the punishment, climate they execute the prohibited act. If the punishment is viewed as outweighing the rewards, climate they carry out not perform it. Occasionally criminologists loaned the phrase cost-benefit analysis from economists to explain this type of decision-making process.

When assessing whether deterrence works or not, it is important to differentiate between general deterrence and details deterrence. Basic deterrence is the idea the every human punished by the legislation serves as an instance to rather contemplating the exact same unlawful act. Particular deterrence is the idea that the individuals punished by the regulation will not commit their crimes again due to the fact that they “learned a lesson.”

Critics the deterrence theory point to high recidivism rates as proof the the theory does no work. Recidivism method a relapse right into crime. In other words, those who space punished through the criminal justice device tend to reoffend in ~ a very high rate. Some critics likewise argue that rational choice theory does no work. Lock argue that such things as crime of passion and crimes committed by those under the affect of drugs and also alcohol room not the product that a reasonable cost-benefit analysis.

As unpopular as rational choice theories may be with certain schools of modern academic criminology, they room critically necessary to understanding how the criminal justice mechanism works. This is since nearly the whole criminal justice device is based upon rational an option theory. The idea that people commit crimes since they decision to execute so is the very foundation of criminal regulation in the unified States. In fact, the intent element must it is in proven beyond a reasonable doubt in nearly every felony well-known to American criminal law before a conviction can be secured. Without a culpable psychological state, there is no crime (with very few exceptions).


Incapacitation is a really pragmatic goal of criminal justice. The idea is that if criminals space locked up in a secure environment, they can not go roughly victimizing daily citizens. The weak of incapacitation is the it works only as lengthy as the offender is locked up. There is no real question that incapacitation reduces crime by part degree. The biggest troubles with incapacitation is the cost. There space high social and also moral prices when the criminal justice system takes human being out of their homes, far from their families, and also out that the workforce and also lock castle up for a protracted period. In addition, there are really heavy financial prices with this model. Really long jail sentences an outcome in very big prison populations which call for a very large prison commercial complex. These costs have put a crippling financial load on many states.


Rehabilitation is a noble score of penalty by the state that seeks to help the offender become a productive, noncriminal member the society. Throughout history, there have been several different notions as to how this assist should be administered. Once our modern-day correctional system was forming, this was the dominate model. We can see by the very name corrections that the idea was to aid the offender become a non-offender. Education programs, faith-based programs, drug therapy programs, anger administration programs, and also many others are aimed at helping the offender “get better.”

Overall, rehabilitation efforts have had bad results when measured by looking at recidivism rates. Those that the criminal justice system tried to help tend come reoffend at around the same rate as those who serve jail time without any type of kind that treatment. Advocates of rehabilitation suggest out that past efforts failed since they were underfunded, ill-conceived, or poorly executed. Today’s medicine courts are an instance of exactly how we may be moving ago toward a much more rehabilitative model, particularly with first time and nonviolent offenders.


Retribution way giving offenders the penalty they deserve. Most adherents come this idea believe that the punishment have to fit the offense. This idea is known as the doctrine that proportionality. Together a theory was promoted by early on Italian criminologist Cesare Beccaria who regarded the harsh punishments of his day as being disproportionate to many of the crime committed. The term just desert is frequently used to explain a deserved punishment the is proportionate to the crime committed.

In reality, the theory of proportionality is an overwhelming to achieve. There is no method that the assorted legislatures deserve to go around objectively measure criminal culpability. The process is among legislative consensus, and also is imprecise at best.

A racist System?

The United states today deserve to be explained as both multiracial and also multiethnic. This has actually led to racism. Racism is the id that members that one race room inferior to members of one more race. Because white americans of european heritage are the majority, racism in America typically takes ~ above the character of whites against racial and ethnic minorities. Historically, this ethnic minorities have not been provided equal footing on together important facets of life together employment, housing, education, healthcare, and also criminal justice. As soon as this unequal treatment is willful, it deserve to be described as racial discrimination. The regulation forbids gyeongju discrimination in the criminal righteousness system, simply as it does in the workplace.

Disproportionate minority contact refers to the disproportionate variety of minorities who come into call with the criminal justice system. Disproportionate minority contact is a difficulty in both the adult and juvenile solution at every level of those systems. Together the gatekeepers of the criminal justice system, the police are frequently accused of discrimination practices.

Courts are not immune come cries that racism native individuals and also politically energetic groups. The American civil Liberties Union (2014), because that example, states, “African-Americans are incarcerated for medicine offenses at a price that is 10 times higher than that of whites.”

The literature on disproportionate decimal sentencing distinguishes in between legal and extralegal factors. Legal components are those things that we accept as legitimately, together a issue of law, mitigating or aggravating criminal sentences. Such points as the seriousness the the offense and the defendant’s front criminal record autumn into this category. Extralegal factors include things choose class, race, and also gender. This are concerned as illegitimate components in determining criminal sentences. They have nothing to execute with the defendant’s criminal behavior, and everything to carry out with the defendant’s condition as a member that a specific group.

One method to measure racial disparity is to to compare the ratio of world that room members that a specific group (their relationship in the general population) v the ratio or that team at a certain stage in the criminal justice system. In 2013, the office of the Census (Bureau of the Census, 2014) estimated that African-Americans comprised 13.2% the the populace of the united States. According to the FBI, 28.4% of all arrestees were African-American. From this info we have the right to see the the relationship of African-Americans arrested was just over dual what one would certainly expect.

The disparity is an ext pronounced once it pertains to drug crime. According to the NAACP (2014), “African Americans represent 12% the the total populace of medicine users, but 38% of those arrested for drug offenses, and 59% that those in state jail for a medicine offense.”

There room three straightforward explanations because that these disparities in the criminal justice system. The very first is individual racism. Individual racism describes a particular person’s beliefs, assumptions, and also behaviors. This type of racism manifests itself once the individual police officer, defense attorney, prosecutor, judge, parole board member, or parole officer is bigoted. One more explanation of gyeongju disparities in the criminal justice mechanism is institutional racism. Institutional racism manifests itself once departmental plans (both formal and informal), regulations, and also laws an outcome in unfair therapy of a details group. A 3rd (and controversial) explanation is differential involvement in crime. The straightforward idea is that African-Americans and also Hispanics are associated in more criminal activity. Often this is tied to social problems such as poor education, poverty, and unemployment.

While the does not seem that bigotry is existing in every page of the criminal and also juvenile justice systems, that does show up that there are pockets of prejudice in ~ both systems. That is difficult to deny the data: Discrimination go take location in such locations as usage of force by police and the imposition the the death penalty. Historically, i do not have anything was the disparity much more discussed and debated than in federal medicine policy. If much has actually recently changed with the i of the Fair Sentencing plot of 2010, commonwealth drug regulation was a prime example of institutional racism at work.

See more: How Much Is 79 Euros In Us Dollars, 79 Euro To Us Dollar Or Convert 79 Eur To Usd

Under previous law, crimes including crack cocaine to be punished much, much more severely than powder cocaine. The law had specific harsh penalties the were triggered by weight, and also a supplication that required one hundreds times an ext powder 보다 crack. Countless deemed the law racist due to the fact that the bulk of arrests for crack cocaine were of African-Americans, and the bulk of arrests because that powder cocaine to be white. African-American defendants have actually appealed their sentences based on Fourteenth modification equal defense claims.