Intermolecular forces (IMFs) deserve to be provided to predict relative boiling points. The more powerful the IMFs, the lower the vapor pressure of the substance and the higher the boil point. Therefore, we have the right to compare the relative strengths the the IMFs the the compounds come predict their loved one boiling points.

You are watching: Which factor is generally responsible for high melting points?

H-bonding > dipole-dipole > London dispersion (van der Waals)

When compare compounds with the exact same IMFs, we usage size and shape together tie breakers due to the fact that the London dispersion forces increase as the surface area increases. Due to the fact that all compounds exhibit some level the London dispersion forces and compounds capable of H-bonding additionally exhibit dipole-dipole, we will use the expression "dominant IMF" to interact the IMF many responsible for the physical properties of the compound.

In the table below, us see instances of these relationships. As soon as comparing the structural isomers of pentane (pentane, isopentane, and neopentane), castle all have actually the same molecular formula C5H12. However, together the carbon chain is reduce to develop the carbon branches found in isopentane and neopentane the all at once surface area the the molecules decreases. The visual image of MO theory can be useful in seeing every compound as a cloud of electron in an every encompassing MO system. Branching creates much more spherical forms noting that the sphere permits the preferably volume v the least surface area. The structure isomers v the cg-tower.comical formula C2H6O have various dominant IMFs. The H-bonding that ethanol outcomes in a fluid for cocktails in ~ room temperature, when the weaker dipole-dipole that the dimethylether results in a gas a room temperature. In the critical example, we see the 3 IMFs compared directly to show the family member strength IMFs come boiling points.


Boiling points and also melting points

The observable melting and boiling points of various organic molecules provides an additional illustration that the results of noncovalent interactions. The overarching principle connected is simple: the stronger the noncovalent interactions in between molecules, the much more energy the is required, in the kind of heat, to break them apart. Higher melting and also boiling points represent stronger noncovalent intermolecular forces.

Consider the boiling point out of increasingly larger hydrocarbons. More carbons way a better surface area feasible for hydrophobic interaction, and also thus greater boiling points.


As you would certainly expect, the strength of intermolecular hydrogen bonding and also dipole-dipole interactions is reflected in greater boiling points. Just look in ~ the trend for hexane (nonpolar London dispersion interactions just ), 3-hexanone (dipole-dipole interactions), and also 3-hexanol (hydrogen bonding).


Of particular interest to biologists (and pretty lot anything else that is alive in the universe) is the effect of hydrogen bonding in water. Since it is maybe to form tight networks of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, water continues to be in the fluid phase in ~ temperatures up to 100 OC, (slightly reduced at high altitude). The world would obviously it is in a very different place if water boiled in ~ 30 OC.


1. Based on their structures, location phenol, benzene, benzaldehyde, and benzoic acid in regards to lowest to highest possible boiling point.



By thinking around noncovalent intermolecular interactions, we can also predict loved one melting points. Every one of the same values apply: more powerful intermolecular interactions an outcome in a higher melting point. Ionic compounds, as expected, normally have very high melting points due to the stamin of ion-ion interaction (there space some ionic compounds, however, that are liquids in ~ room temperature). The existence of polar and also especially hydrogen-bonding teams on essential compounds typically leads to higher melting points. Molecular shape, and the ability of a molecule to load tightly right into a decision lattice, has a very big effect on melt points. The flat shape of fragrant compounds such as napthalene and also biphenyl enables them come stack with each other efficiently, and thus aromatics have tendency to have higher melting points compared to alkanes or alkenes with similar molecular weights.


Comparing the melt points the benzene and toluene, you deserve to see the the extra methyl group on toluene disrupts the molecule"s ability to stack, for this reason decreasing the cumulative toughness of intermolecular London dispersion forces.

See more: Types Of An Angle Whose Measure Is Between 90 And 180, 270, And 360 Degrees


Note likewise that the boiling point for toluene is 111 oC, fine above the boiling allude of benzene (80 oC). The an essential factor for the boiling point trend in this instance is dimension (toluene has one more carbon), whereas for the melting point trend, shape plays a much much more important role. This provides sense as soon as you think about that melting requires ‘unpacking’ the molecule from their ordered array, vice versa, boiling requires simply separating them from your already loose (liquid) association with each other.

If you are taking one organic lab course, you might have currently learned the impurities in a crystalline substance will reason the observed melting point to it is in lower compared to a pure sample of the very same substance. This is since impurities disrupt the ordered packing arrangement of the crystal, and make the cumulative intermolecular interactions weaker.