Ken GreenwaldPosts: 3813Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:25 amCountry: USAFirst Name: KenLast Name: GreenwaldLocation: Ft.Collins, Colorado, USA

tomorrow is an additional day / morning is a new day

Postby Ken Greenwald » Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:16 pm


I was simply reading an article in U.S. News & human being Report (March 28, 2005) entitled ‘Eat that Now! – just how savvy marketing is contributing to the nation’s excessive weight epidemic,’ in which ns came across the following:
“You walk past a doughnut shop, and also you say, Yum. Doughnuts.’ part of girlfriend says, ‘No, I’ll acquire fat.’ yet another component is choose Scarlett O’Hara saying, ‘Tomorrow is one more day.’ This feels good now.”
Hmm. ‘Tomorrow is another day.’ No the isn’t! (<) just kidding. Sounds like a proverb, or was it an development of Margaret Mitchell in 1936, which to be the last sentence of she novel Gone v the Wind?TOMORROW IS another DAY actually has actually two slightly different meanings: 1) did you do it done sufficient for someday so leave the rest for tomorrow; be patient, speed yourself, and you don’t need to do it as whole – after every ‘Rome wasn’t built in a day.’ 2) Don’t offer up or shed hope. Points didn’t walk so fine today, yet there will be an additional chance morning for a fresh start; you may have actually lost today yet you will certainly have one more chance to win in the future. In this sense ‘tomorrow’ may be provided literally a) or figuratively b) The expression days from at the very least the 16th century, when it was initially put as TOMORROW IS A brand-new DAY ( 1527). The first appearance in the present form was in 1913, however it considerably increased in popularity as the closing line of the novel (1936) and movie (1939) ‘Gone with the Wind’ (1936).
(Facts on paper Dictionary the Proverbs, Oxford dictionary of Proverbs, random House thesaurus of America’s popular Proverbs, truth on record Dictionary that Clichés, American Heritage thesaurus of Idioms, Oxford English Dictionary)____________________Ken G – march 22, 2005
*

Erik_KowalPosts: 9008Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:28 pmCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: ErikLast Name: KowalLocation: UK; lived numerous years in USA

tomorrow is an additional day / tomorrow is a new day

Postby Erik_Kowal » Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:50 pm


On the other hand, Rome wasn"t developed tomorrow.

You are watching: After all tomorrow is another day meaning


ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: -- Looking increase a word? try OneLook"s metadictionary (--> definitions) and also reverse thesaurus (--> terms based upon your definitions)8-- add favourite diary entries, quotations and more here8 -- Find brand-new postings conveniently with active Topics8-- want to research study a word? Get crucial tips from experienced researcher Ken Greenwald
*

Phil WhitePosts: 4060Joined: sat Jan 01, 2005 11:24 amCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: PhilLast Name: WhiteLocation: Merseyside
A door right into one of mine favourite linguistic topics!"Tomorrow is an additional day" was supplied as an example by Benjamin Lee Whorf to underpin what has end up being known as the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.Edward Sapir researched the interrelationships between language and experience:
The truth of the issue is the the “real world” is come a large extent unconsciously accumulated on the language habits of the team . . . We see and also hear and otherwise experience really largely as we do since the language habits of our community predispose particular choices of interpretation.
His student, Whorf, worked with American Indian languages and identified that in Hopi, native denoting systems of time (e.g. "day") have actually no plural kind and can not be counting ("three days"). The inferred from this the English speakers have actually an entirely various conception the the nature the time native Hopi speakers. In the Hopi view, every day is a recurrence that a solitary phenomenon, and thus "tomorrow is an additional day" would be at the really least bewildering come a Hopi speaker.The ramifications of any claim that our tardy of the world about us is totally shackled by the language we use to express that perception are huge and have straight bearing on any kind of discussion of computer (e.g. Http://www.cg-tower.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?t=6722) among other things.Personally, being daily faced by two carefully related language with very different underlying structures, ns vacillate in between supporting the strong version that the hypothesis and also rejecting the entirely, and also have done so because that the previous 30 years.
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: Phil WhiteNon sum felix lepus
Top
mongrowlPosts: 138Joined: sun Jan 02, 2005 7:05 amCountry: USAFirst Name: LouisLast Name: BusseyLocation: Boise,
perSAPIRThe truth of the issue is the the “real world” is to a large extent unconsciously collected on the language habits of the group . . . We see and also hear and otherwise experience very largely together we do due to the fact that the language actions of our neighborhood predispose details choices of interpretation.perWHITEThe ramifications of any kind of claim the our tardy of the world about us is completely shackled by the language we usage to express the perception are substantial and have straight bearing on any discussion that PC, among other things.Phil, is the (strong version) "Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis" really as binary Aristotelian as you make it here? Is german as poor as English is, in forcing black and also white predication?? might this it is in the source of her quandary?
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: every we deserve to do is the best we have the right to do.
Top
Ken GreenwaldPosts: 3813Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:25 amCountry: USAFirst Name: KenLast Name: GreenwaldLocation: Ft.Collins, Colorado, USA

tomorrow is an additional day / tomorrow is a new day

Postby Ken Greenwald » Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:08 am


Phil, it’s a rather a coincidence that I just started to review a nifty small (127 pages) book In various other Words (2004) by Christopher J. Moore. The subject is what Moore call ‘untranslatables’ – native which have no similar term in English. As soon as you discussed the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, the name Whorf rang a bell, not because I know anything around him or the subject, but because I had actually just last night viewed it discussed in Moore’s book:
“In the 1940s, Benjamin Lee Whorf presented the concept that language proceeds from and shapes our cultural life in ‘Language, Thought, and Reality. Whorf’s research into speech and society of the Hopi Indians, whose language, prefer Chinese, has no concept of tenses, started a tide of enquiry into the relationship between language and culture. Academics refer to this area together ‘sociolinguistics.’ What emerges is not just the universal phenomenon that details languages have actually “no word because that X” – fro instance the Algonquin people have no solitary word because that ‘time.’ – or that various other languages have actually “very many word because that X” – the widely held notion the the Inuit civilization have numerous word because that ‘snow’ – but also, conversely, the languages, indeed entirety cultures, have words, terms, and also ideas that are simply untranslatable.”
I love the example that he provides in the introduction, i beg your pardon I will certainly reproduce here, and the book appears to it is in filled v such jewels:
It is 1939 and also two end up foot soldiers space pinned down in a fight during the war between Finland and Russia.“We’re outnumbered,” one soldier says. “They’re must be over forty of them, and also only 2 of us.”“Dear God, it’ll take us all work to bury them!” exclaims the other>
Finnish human being tell this story, along with a variety of others, to illustrate the national characteristic recognized as SISU. ‘Sisu,’ states Professor Kate Remlinger, research in language at cool Valley State college <>, is one untranslatable word, an interpretation something like a dogged and proud refuse to lie down and also be beaten. “The way people talk is a have fun of their worldview, your history, and also their upbringing,” she says, observing that the idea that ‘sisu’ is so necessary to the Finns that, three generations after emigrating <> to the United states of America, it continues to infuse regional Michigan dialect and also culture.
‘Untranslatables’ strikes me together an exciting topic and also I’m going to develop a different posting of that name (including this discussion) for folks to add some of your favorites. ____________________Ken G – in march 22, 2005
Edwin AshworthPosts: 765Joined: Tue january 04, 2005 10:07 pmCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: EdwinLast Name: AshworthLocation: Oldham,

tomorrow is an additional day / tomorrow is a brand-new day

Postby Edwin Ashworth » Wed Mar 23, 2005 12:36 pm


Language doesn"t impact us totally. No many believed Shakespeare as soon as he postulated three tomorrows. (Does that make him the originator of science Fiction?)
*

Phil WhitePosts: 4060Joined: satellite Jan 01, 2005 11:24 amCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: PhilLast Name: WhiteLocation: Merseyside
Louis,Sapir, whom ns quoted, never ever went rather as far as Whorf v respect to the degree that language colors ours perception the the world. To my knowledge, the difference between the strong and weak versions developed after the actual theory was put forward, and also yes, in that is most excessive form, the strong version is generally construed to median that we room pretty well unable to conceive of points if we don"t have actually the linguistic structure with which to express them.I never asserted that German, or English for that matter, forces a binary tardy of reality, without doubt I strongly reject the idea. What I carry out notice, however, is that German, being a much more nominal language than English, has actually a tendency towards higher rigidity in classification than the an ext verbal English. To take it a basic example: "optimize/optimization". As a general rule, German much more regularly supplies nominal develops than English, i beg your pardon favours linguistic forms. Thus (a substantial generalization, that course), English speaker attempt come "optimize" things, while German speaker attempt come "achieve optimization" or "put optimization right into place". I believe that this impacts the way we think around the really concept. Because that English speakers, optimization is a procedure over time (even when provided nominally). For German speakers, the is a an ext concrete milestone to be achieved. In some ways, the distinction is subtle, however in others it is really far-reaching. One of the common stereotypes around Germans is the they are an extremely organized and punctilious, and my suspicion is the this is mirrored by the language. I am, however, undecided as to the direction in i m sorry the influence is exerted. It is, of course, perfectly feasible that there is a mutual reinforcement spiral.
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: Phil WhiteNon amount felix lepus
Top
Edwin AshworthPosts: 765Joined: Tue jan 04, 2005 10:07 pmCountry: joined KingdomFirst Name: EdwinLast Name: AshworthLocation: Oldham,

tomorrow is one more day / morning is a new day

Postby Edwin Ashworth » Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:44 pm


Phil,Perhaps one analogy with the development of maths and also science is valid. Most progress has actually been do by the formulation of various language/s or "language/s" to effort to describe, explain or far better explain observed phenomena, and also perhaps come predict and also utilise. Sometimes but the procedure is language (theory) -driven - i think that non-Euclidean geometry is quite "pure". I"m sure that her MRS concept is correct. Sadly, spirals (at the very least the helix subset) deserve to lead upwards or under the tubes.
*

Erik_KowalPosts: 9008Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:28 pmCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: ErikLast Name: KowalLocation: UK; lived many years in USA

tomorrow is another day / morning is a brand-new day

Postby Erik_Kowal » Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:30 pm


Edwin: MRS?
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: -- Looking increase a word? try OneLook"s metadictionary (--> definitions) and reverse dictionary (--> terms based upon your definitions)8-- contribute favourite diary entries, quote and much more here8 -- Find new postings easily with active Topics8-- desire to research study a word? Get essential tips from experienced researcher Ken Greenwald
Edwin AshworthPosts: 765Joined: Tue january 04, 2005 10:07 pmCountry: unified KingdomFirst Name: EdwinLast Name: AshworthLocation: Oldham,

tomorrow is an additional day / tomorrow is a brand-new day

Postby Edwin Ashworth » Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:20 pm


Sorry, Erik et al (Where IS Al?) - common Reinforcement Spiral. Such a concept (a double-acting feedback theory) deserves one acronym (or is it quasi-acronym if an accepted brand-new word doesn"t ensue?), ns feel Phil deserves immortalising, and also MRS sounds far better than rather I can think of.
dalehilemanPosts: 1542Joined: sunlight Jan 02, 2005 6:22 pmCountry: USAFirst Name: DaleLast Name: HilemanLocation: apple VAlley,
Very interesting thread. In what i hope is a related topic, among our correspondents has accused me of one error in perception wherein one confuses an item with the word for it. I remember this as a principle from "General Semantics" part 40-50 years ago. Hope to boost my thinking, I"d appreciate someone explaining exactly how this confusion comes about--in, say, 25 native or less--with a couple of concerete instances of how I have fallen right into the habit myself, if certainly I have
*

Erik_KowalPosts: 9008Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:28 pmCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: ErikLast Name: KowalLocation: UK; lived numerous years in USA
Signature: -- Looking increase a word? try OneLook"s metadictionary (--> definitions) and also reverse thesaurus (--> terms based upon your definitions)8-- contribute favourite diary entries, quotations and an ext here8 -- Find brand-new postings easily with energetic Topics8-- desire to research study a word? Get essential tips from knowledgeable researcher Ken Greenwald
Edwin AshworthPosts: 765Joined: Tue jan 04, 2005 10:07 pmCountry: unified KingdomFirst Name: EdwinLast Name: AshworthLocation: Oldham,

tomorrow is an additional day / tomorrow is a new day

Postby Edwin Ashworth » Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:14 pm


I bet you"d have been charged for 27 indigenous on the old telegram scale, Erik.

See more: Who Sings Shes Like The Wind ', The Story Of


ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Top
Erik_KowalPosts: 9008Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:28 pmCountry: unified KingdomFirst Name: ErikLast Name: KowalLocation: UK; lived plenty of years in USA

tomorrow is another day / tomorrow is a new day

Postby Erik_Kowal » Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:53 pm


Exactly, Edwin. I knew you were smart sufficient to assist me prove the point!
*

ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: -- Looking increase a word? shot OneLook"s metadictionary (--> definitions) and also reverse thesaurus (--> terms based upon your definitions)8-- contribute favourite diary entries, quotations and more here8 -- Find brand-new postings conveniently with energetic Topics8-- want to research a word? Get crucial tips from experienced researcher Ken Greenwald
Edwin AshworthPosts: 765Joined: Tue january 04, 2005 10:07 pmCountry: united KingdomFirst Name: EdwinLast Name: AshworthLocation: Oldham,

tomorrow is another day / morning is a new day

Postby Edwin Ashworth » Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:44 pm


I ain"t help NOBODY prove no negatives, Erik. Not also the photographer.Dale - aren"t we into the reality v consciousness of reality conflict here? us all recognize what, for instance, a "dog" is, but we"ll every have various "internal books" on the topic - part with much better pictures and/or factsheets, some with more varieties. Part with more comical anecdotes (shaggy dog stories). More than likely most comprise a couple of mistakes. We should tailor the precision and also attractiveness of ours language to the case - "There"s a 10-stone dog guarding the house," would certainly probably acquire the intended message across, however "Dog wins an initial Prize at Crufts" is quite sketchy. However I intend that us all had our own individual reactions to to speak "The Hound of the Baskervilles". And so "dog" means different things, listed below the surface level, come everybody.